
Git is most useful when the history explains how a project changed. A lightweight workflow can give a small team that clarity without adding unnecessary process.
Create a branch for one feature, fix, or piece of maintenance. A focused branch is easier to review and less likely to contain unrelated changes. Small pull requests also make it simpler to identify the source of a regression.
A good commit answers what changed and why. Prefer a sequence of understandable commits over one large snapshot when the work has natural stages. Before committing, inspect the diff and remove temporary files, debug output, and accidental formatting changes.
Review the behavior as well as the code. Check error states, edge cases, and whether tests cover the changed path. Running the project locally before requesting review catches problems that are difficult to see from a diff alone.
The main branch should remain in a state that another developer can build and run. Merge work only after required checks pass, and fix broken builds promptly. This habit turns version control into a reliable record of the product rather than a storage place for unfinished experiments.